title

Questionnaire


This Workshop is the opportunity to improve the quality and the usability of the first draft of the handbook. Your answers will help us to improve the quality of the handbook.

YOUR OPINION ABOUT THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE HANDBOOK

CONTENT

Q1. Will this handbook be useful for your organisation?
Yes No Don't know

Q2. Will this handbook be useful for the rad-hard community?
Yes No Don't know

Q3. Do you think the handbook's content is suited to beginners?
Yes No Don't know

Q4. Does the Handbook cover the topics that you would like to see in such a document?
Yes No Don't know

Q5. Are the topics sufficiently detailed?
Yes No Don't know
If no, please indicate any specific information you consider to be missing in this document.


STYLE

Q6. What do you think about the quality of writing?
Poor Fair Excellent Don't know

Q7. What do you think about the precision of technical descriptions?
Poor Fair Excellent Don't know

SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION

Q8. Your opinion about the figures
- Their relevance:
Poor Correct Good Don't know

- Their number
Poor Sufficient Excessive Don't know

- Their clarity
Poor Correct Good Don't know

Q9. Your opinion about the tables
- Their relevance:
Poor Correct Good Don't know

- Their number
Low Sufficient Excessive Don't know

- Their clarity
Poor Correct Good Don't know

Q10. Your opinion about the diagrams:
- Their relevance
Poor Correct Good Don't know

- Their number
Low Correct Excessive Don't know

- Their clarity
Poor Sufficient Good Don't know

USABILITY

Q11. Can you easily find the information that you are looking for?
Yes No Don't know
If no, please give details:


Q12. Is the use of the handbook
Easy Difficult

Q13. Is the handbook structured correctly?
Yes No Don't know
If no, please give details:


Q14. Is the structure of the HB appropriate to the content?
Yes No Don't know
If no, please give details:


Q15. Is the pdf format user-friendly?
Yes No Don't know
If no, please give details:


Q16. Does the format (tables, diagrams, figures, etc.) fit the content?
Yes No Don't know
If no, please give details:


Q17. Are the figures, tables, diagrams, etc., usable?
Yes No Don't know
If no, please give details:


INTERACTIVE VERSION OF THE HANDBOOK

GENERAL USABILITY

Q18. Is the html version user-friendly?
Yes No Don't know

Q19. Would an html version be useful for your activity?
Yes No Don't know

Q20. Is the permanent display of the table of content useful?
Yes No Don't know

Q21. Is the density of information per page adapted?
Yes No Don't know

Q22. Do you think a search engine would be useful for specific requests?
Yes No Don't know


LINK BETWEEN HTML AND PRINTABLE VERSION

Q23. Would it be useful to be able to print pdf pages of the html version?
Yes No Don't know

LINK BETWEEN TEXT AND FIGURE

Q24. Is the text-figure interaction (pop-up window) usable?
Yes No Don't know

Q25. Would you prefer a presentation where text and figures are displayed as in the pdf version?
Yes No Don't know


TECHNIQUES SELECTION

Q26. What do you think about the way the techniques are presented?
Useful Not useful Don't know

Q27. Are these criteria adapted to allow a precise selection of mitigation techniques?
Yes No Don't know

Q28. Would you like extra options on the html version (for example, Cart to collect reading notes, or allowing on line annotations?
Yes No Don't know
If yes, please give details:



ABOUT YOU

Your name (optional):

Your position:
Engineer Commercial Manager
Other (please precise):


Level of abstraction involved in your activity:
Technology IC layout or architecture Software System
N/A (please precise):


Your level of expertise:
Beginner Confirmed Expert


Thanks a lot for your contribution!

Return to Workshop website